.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Obama
as
Leninoid
By James Lewis
August 20th, 2009
The American Thinker
AMERICANTHINKER.COM
___(Part TWO of FIVE)
___(Links are in GREEN)
That includes European social democracies, which routinely engage in the same political tactics, mostly exercised through the media.
(Social democrats tend to use peaceful methods, like constant propaganda, indoctrination through the media, and vote buying as opposed to mass terror.
They cannot be confused with murderous Leninist regimes, but they still constantly require new victim groups to appeal to —
which is why they import Pakistani Muslims from Peshawar into London.
They are cheap votes, and anybody who disagrees is viciously scapegoated through the media.)
.
.
.
.
The Lenin way of doing it was through mob agitation to murder.
This appears in his famous
Lenin’s hanging order
(Lenin’s Secret Files (1997).
“Comrades!
The insurrection of five kulak districts should be pitilessly suppressed.
The interests of the whole revolution require this because ‘the last decisive battle’ with the kulaks is now under way everywhere.
An example must be demonstrated.
1. Hang (and make sure that the hanging takes place in full view of the people) no fewer than one hundred known kulaks,rich men, bloodsuckers.
2. Publish their names.
3. Seize all their grain from them.
4. Designate hostages in accordance with yesterday’s telegram.
Do it in such a fashion that for hundreds of kilometres around the people might see, tremble, know, shout:“they are strangling,and will strangle to death,the bloodsucking kulaks”.
That is the principle of terror:
Terrifying masses of people by hanging or blowing up selected enemies.
Again, social democrats prefer to avoid violence, and in Europe they often manage to do so by bribing voters, importing cheap new votes from poor countries, and the like.
But the manipulative methods are similar:
Leninoids always find victim groups, or create them, or import them, and then claim to speak on their behalf.
That is happening today in the United States with illegal immigrants.
These are not just accidents but deliberate policy.
It is also an historical fact that the European and American Left, while avoiding violence domestically, has always supported and celebreated violent revolution in Cambodia with Pol Pot, in China with Mao, in Russia with Stalin and Lenin, and so on ad infinitum.
They don’t object to violence, and in fact rationalize it whenever it happens.
They just don’t want it at home.
.
.
.
.
Exploiting ethnic hatreds
Karl Marx hated Jews, Christians, and blacks.
But officially the Left is anti-racist.
The first person to introduce a major ethnic dimension into Marxist movements was Lenin.
He conducted an anti-Cossack campaign, systematically trying to destroy the ethnic Cossacks of the Don River region.
on Lenin is always described as being against anti-Semitism —
it was only capitalist Jews who were the enemy;
it was Stalin who killed and exiled many thousands of Jews,
and inspired more anti-Semitism though the “Doctor’s Plot.”
Much more important is Lenin’s “anti-imperialism,”
where “imperialism” is defined on the Left as the (white) capitalist countries that trade and therefore “exploit” any country that is non-white.
That is the Third World Socialism Obama inherited from his Kenyan socialist father.
That’s what Obama’s
“Dreams from my Father” is about.
(More about that below).
Propagating ethnic strife and racism is now endemic on the Left, justified by Lenin’s version of Marx.
The fact that it’s anti-white
racism still makes it racism.
Controlling the media
It was Lenin who centralized the Russian newspapers and radio into a single propaganda apparatus, led by Pravda and Izstvestiya.
Modern mass media propaganda
was invented by the Left,
notably in Lenin’s early Soviet Union.
The Nazis used it,
but they came later.
Demonizing the opposition
Obama constantly demonizes.
He has demonized auto companies,
and fired the president of GM.
He has demonized the insurance companies, and doctors who supposedly do tonsillectomies even when that isn’t needed, just to make money.
Or they amputate limbs for diabetics rather than treat them with drugs.
Those are lies, and they are lies designed to make the scapegoats look evil.
They are malevolent lies.
Lenin was a first-rate demagogue.
That is how he was able to make the transition between community organizer and Glorious Leader of a vast country with tens of millions of people.
Lenin raised the art of demagogy to a national and international level,
using the international media and the educational systems as instruments of wall-to-wall propaganda.
Anti-Obama protesters have now been described as an “unruly mob” by the media, which are in total hock to Obama.
.
.
.
.
.
Radical guru Saul Alinsky
simply called the American
middle class “the enemy.”
(That would be you and me.).
It’s weird for an American president to consider most of the American population “the enemy.”
This is not like Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neil getting together for drinks after a hard day of political infighting in Washington.
This Rahm Emanuel’s
politics as Kill! Kill! Kill!
.
.
.
.
Alinsky gave radicals the recipe for mob scapegoating,
and admitted that yes,
it was destructive and cruel,
but tough noogies.
Alinsky admired tough
treatment of enemies,
which is why he stayed
friends with Frank Nitti,
Chicago mobster and
therefore a professional killer,
drug runner,
and career criminal.
Obama has openly said words approaching the famous line from The Untouchables:
“If they bring a knife
to the fight,
we bring a gun.”
Alinsky and Capone would
have toasted that one.
So would Lenin.
.
.
.
.
It strikes me as weird for an American president to think of domestic politics as all-out war —
especially given the reality of real enemies in the world who openly wish us ill.
Claiming absolute power —
even if you don’t have it
in the New York Post
quotes Obama’s “Pay Czar”
as follows:
‘PAY Czar’ Kenneth Feinberg’s official government title is “special master for compensation.”
You’ll be happy to know that he’s really getting into the confiscatory spirit of his role.
Asked by Reuters if his powers include reaching back and revoking bonuses awarded to financial-industry executives before his
office was created this year, Feinberg asserted broad and binding authorities —including the ability to “claw back” money already paid out.
Regulations governing his office explicitly limit his jurisdiction over contracts signed before Feb. 11, 2009.
But the fine print is no obstacle to President Obama’s czars.
“The statute provides these guideposts,but the statute ultimately says I have discretion to decide what it is that these people should make and that my determination will be final,” Feinberg claims.
“Anything is possible under the law.”
That is a huge and deliberate violation of Constitutional thought.
But claiming infinite powers is common for Obama.
.
.
.
.
That’s why he has more than thirty “Czars” — Emperors —
in the White House,
to override Cabinet Department heads,
who have to be approved by the Senate.
It all descends from the first real power wielder in the history of Marxism,
V.I. Lenin.
Never admit you’re wrong
According to Wikipedia’s
“In the early 1930s, it became accepted dogma under Stalin to assume that neither Lenin nor the Central Committee could ever be wrong.
Therefore, it was necessary to remove evidence of situations where Lenin and Stalin had actually disagreed,since in those situations it was impossible for both to have been right at the same time.
… Later, even the fifth “complete” Soviet edition of Lenin’s works (published in 55 thick volumes between 1958 and 1965)left out parts that either contradicted dogma or showed their author in an unfavorable light.”
Obama always blames
Republicans,
Rush Limbaugh and
George W. Bush.
He has never
yet blamed himself.
Obama’s Socialism
is Leninoid
The Leninoid parallels start with Obama’s basic beliefs about the world and about America’s role in it.
All this is important, because Obama has deliberately fuzzed up his past and his real opinions.
.
.
.
.
His Alinsky connection
is well known.
But most conservatives don’t study the Left, including its most basic beliefs.
We don’t want to be
accused of Red baiting.
We don’t want to do Red baiting,
being decent people.
But if the shoe fits,
it’s not Red baiting.
It’s just trying to figure who
we have in the White House.
Obama is ideologically Leninoid because a lot of the hard Left is that way.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
